Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Brewing Adventures - Part I

This first post is just to outline some of the beers I have made (along with brewing partner, Piet), since we started home brewing in April.
Over the last 5 months, Piet and myself have brewed over 200L of various styles of beer. That's 606 x 330mL bottles - 50 dozen. Each brew yields about 22L of finished beer (we can change the volume, but 22L seems to be a good number), so that's about 66 x 330mL bottles per brew. Awesome.
Just for shits and giggles, I'll go through - from the first brew to the last - and give a brief description of each...

Cloned American Pale Ale - Our first brew (~6%abv)
So... Where to begin? Our first brew day was far from smooth. We had plenty of booksmarts, but little knowledge on how to actually use those smarts with our own equipment. We hadn't yet discovered the beauty and gracefullness of using software and calculators to create the best recipes, so we had just modified a pale ale recipe from 'Clone Brews'.
There were only a few differences, such as us using chocolate malt instead of a certain caramalt, and tweeking the hops to suit what was available.
We mashed in the boiling pot using a stockinette, and needless to say, there was sugary wort everywhere. It was like the floor was covered in glue...We eventually got the boil going fine, and added our hops (which, looking back, were WAY out of balance).
Once the boil had finished, we took our two boiling pots to various locations to try and cool the wort in a water bath... Interesting. Kind of messy.
The fact that our beer did not acquire an infection is a miracle. It's like we completely forgot aseptic technique whilst transferring the wort to the fermenter...
About half way through the boil, we realised that our yeast needed to be activated. We had bought some pre-packed stuff from our local homebrew supply shop. We tried out best to activate it, but it was showing no signs of life when we pitched it.
In the morning, there was no activity at all, so we went about bought a sachet of dried yeast, and chucked it in the fermenter. The next day, our first all-grain brew was bubbling away happily.
We bottled about 2 weeks later, and tasted soon after that. I'll give you the notes I wrote, using a bottle that was aged a few weeks:
Beer pours a bit hazy red/brown hue, with a thin off-white head. Aroma had cherries (especially in the older bottles), some chocolate notes, and strong grapefruit-like cascade. Flavours have some coffee-ish chocolate malt, with zesty hops. Reasonably bitter near the end - but a good bitterness. Carbonation is good. Medium to light bodied.
Overall, it was an enjoyable beer (especially considering the sloppiness of the brew!), and even got some good reviews from my friends in Wellington. I would place this one far above the mainstream, mass produced beers you find in the fridge at the supermarket, and it's not nearly as expensive!

German Pilsner Disaster (~5.5%abv)
Well.. This brew sure was interesting. We found an old sac of grain from Piet's old workplace, and decided it would be good to make a Pilsner-style lager.
We did everything in a similar, yet slightly more efficient fashion, than the last brew, and so the only really terrible thing was our ingredients.
Our hops were fine, but we added way too much for the bittering stage, and so the bitterness in the final product was kind of astringent. The grain we used was old and probably stale, and shat out immense, agglutinated protein during the boil... Perhaps we should have done a protein rest?? This protein looked like grey egg matter, floating in the pale liquid.
Trying to brew a lager with our limited experience was a bit naiive, as we still had little awareness to the importance of hot/cold breaks, and finings. Our cooling system was still a waterbath and about 40 minutes of stirring....
But anyway, we got it into the fermenter and pitched our activated Wyeast Bohemian Pilsener sachet (we had learned not to get old, home-packaged yeast anymore)...
We fermented relatively cold (about 8-10 degrees). Over the next few weeks the fermenter smelled like a volcano - massive amounts of sulfur being processed by the yeast (see my other post about Saccharomyces!). We had heard about the sulfur gas being produced in cold-fermented lagers, so we let it continue. I think the sheer amount of protein from the grain was to blame for the huge sulfur smell (as sulfur is bound within protein).
Fermentation finished and we bottled. Lagering means 'storing', so we decided to let it lager in the bottles.
After a few weeks we opened a bottle and got nothing but fart - still way too sulfury. The flavours were slightly sulfury also, and there was that astringent bitterness from the hops.
About 3 months after bottling, our pilsner had lost almost all of it's sulfur (thanks yeast) and was now bearable to drink. But still a bit soapy, and far too bitter in the initial palate. We still have two bottles left, so I'll have to write some proper notes for it.

The Dunkleweizen (~5%abv)
Admittedly, this was only my third brew, and Piet's fourth, as I was sick when he made a Belgian Witbier. Since then, however, we have made another witbier which I'll describe in more detail, later.
The dunkleweizen is a German dark wheat beer, and was one of our more successful brews.
Unfortunately, my notes on this aren't very comprehensive, so it'll be a short entry...
We decided to do this one because we still had wheat beer yeast from the previous brew. The malts we used included 2 row pale, wheat, chocolate, carapils and crystal, and we used Jade and Hallertau hops.
The methodology was rather the same as the other brews, but we had come closer to perfecting our mash (using a spare fermenting barrel) and we had devised a better cooling system (running the hot wort through copper tubing submerged in cold water).
The ingredients and yeast worked together beautifully to create an effervescent, flavourful (yet moderately alcoholic) brew, that was enjoyed rather quickly! The hops were well balanced with the sweetness of the wheat and the roastiness of chocolate malt.
Definitely one to brew again.

The Stoat - Dunedin Oatmeal Stout (~6.5%abv)
Wow. I fucking love this beer. This one was Piet's recipe, and was a great success, so much that we entered it into the SOBA National Homebrew Championship (we're still waiting for the results).
Everything seemed to work out very well on the brew day. We carried out a protein, then beta-glucan rest on the flaked oats (with added barley - for enzymes) and then added it to the rest of the grain. This was the first of our brews where we controlled the pH of the mash, which we think helped a lot. The rest of the procedures went rather smoothly, although things seemed to take longer (e.g. the sparge took nearly one hour and the cooling was very slow - probably due to the viscosity of the wort).
We fermented using Wyeasts Irish Ale, which worked beautifully to give a lot of dark fruit-like esters, and a hint of toasted bread.
The 7 different malts were balanced only by 3 additions of Fuggles, imported hops from the UK. The fuggles added a lovely earthy character to the beer.
I'm lacking a set of decent tasting notes to go with this beer, but we still have a few bottles left. I'll probably add some on here in the next week (along with the results from the competition! Wish us luck).

We have done a number of other brews, which I'll get around to describing. Look out for Part II!

Monday, August 24, 2009

Cheers, Louis.

Recently, whilst scouring the fermentation section of the science library, I stumbled across a thin, pamphlet style book, on the cover of which was a stamp; "Inaugural Professorial Lecture - University of Otago, 1996".
Upon closer inspection I noticed the name of the professor giving this special lecture. If you've already guessed it, kudos.

The professor was Jean-Pierre Dufour (or, 'JP'), who was appointed Professor, Chair of Food Science, at the university in 1995. JP continued his scientific research in the department up until his death in 2007, whilst attending an Institute of Brewing and Distillery conference in Nigeria. JP had a studded career and made great contributions to the fields of chemistry, microbiology, enzymology and food science. He also assisted in the success of Emerson's brewery in Dunedin, and so their annual Belgian-style release is entitled 'JP' in his memory.
For more information on these beers, see David Wood's article on JP 2009.

Needless to say, I had found a copy of the handout that would have accompanied JP's lecture - "Thank You Louis Pasteur: 120 Years of Brewing Science", was the title.
JP decided to pay homage to Louis Pasteur, a famous scientist who, like himself, had an impressive career in several fields of science and their applications.

I have come across Pasteur's name many times during my studies (you have too, every time you look at the milk carton, or if you buy beer that has been Pasteurised), but I have always neglected to educate myself on his overwhelming amount of contributions to the understandings of chemistry, fermentation, microbiology, medicine and disease.

Pasteur lived from 1822 to 1895, making massive developments in the field of fermentation and brewing, which led to greater studies of microorganisms and disease. Although Louis seems to be the main focus of the lecture, There is still a great deal on the history and science of brewing.
To save you a good couple hours of reading, I will refrain from summarising the entire lecture booklet. I will, however, transcribe a few selected quotes that I enjoy, maybe with a bit of background information, if you're lucky...

The first quote I would like to share comes from a section about brewing history. More specifically, it is from an article in a journal - Annals of Chemistry, 29, 1839 - published by Friedrich Woehler and Justus von Liebug, who wished to describe their solution to the mystery of alcohol fermentation:
"Beer yeast, when dispersed in water, breaks down into an infinite number of small spheres. If these spheres are transferred into an aqueous solution of sugar they develop into small animals. They are endowed with a sort of suction trunk with which they gulp up the sugar from the solution. Digestion is immediately and clearly recognisable because of the discharge of excrements. These animals evacuate ethyl alcohol from their bowels and carbon dioxide from their urinary organs. Thus one can observe how a specifically lighter fluid is exuded from the anus and rises vertically whereas a stream of carbon dioxide is ejected at very short intervals from their enormously large genitals."
Not long after, Louis showed that the yeast itself was responsible for fermentation. Not tiny animals with huge genitals.

Pasteur played a main role in the elucidation of beer diseases;
"We have in our power to prepare a beer which shall be incapable of undergoing any pernicious fermentation whatsoever"
Pasteur saved the French beer industry (that was quickly being surpassed by that of Germany) by identifying bacteria as the agents of beer spoilage, and then developing pasteurisation to preserve bottled beer.

Without fermentation using yeast, certain molecules and flavours are not produced or modified, and our beer would be very, very different (of course, it would still be called wort). This is something Pasteur could appreciate.
"It is easy to show that finished wort has a decided flavour and aroma of hops, as well as a sweet taste, and that it leaves a certain pleasant, bitter after-taste on the palate. When we taste it in this condition we cannot help thinking that a liquor of the kind, after fermentation, ought to constitute a very valuable beverage, as wholesome as it is pleasant" (L Pasteur).

Undoubtedly I could go on an on, writing about the life of Louis and his work, but alas, there are a set number of hours in a day and I already feel this post is too long!
I'll finish up with a suggestion; Next time you sit down to enjoy your beer, give a little toast to the scientists like Louis Pasteur and Jean-Pierre Dufour, who helped to perfect our brews.
Cheers!